How Many Conflict Management Styles Are There? 

Have you ever wondered how our ability to manage conflicts effectively influences our relationships and workplace dynamics?

Conflicts are an inevitable part of human interactions in any setting—personal, professional, or social—conflict these conflicts can significantly impact our relationships, productivity, and overall well-being. Studies show that managers spend at least 25% of their time resolving conflicts, underscoring the critical role that conflict management plays in maintaining efficient operations and a harmonious work environment.

Developing strong conflict management skills and adopting an accommodating conflict management style are essential for effectively managing conflict and fostering a positive workplace conflict resolution culture.

Understanding the different types of conflict management is crucial for resolving disputes effectively and fostering a collaborative environment that encourages constructive dialogue and mutual understanding.

Effective conflict management involves employing various techniques and styles to handle disputes between parties with differing opinions, needs, or wants. The goal is not necessarily to eliminate conflicts—many conflicts stem from healthy differences that can lead to innovative solutions and growth. Instead, effective conflict management aims to regulate and mitigate conflicts to prevent them from escalating into damaging confrontations.

By recognizing and utilizing appropriate conflict resolution tactics and conflict styles, individuals can effectively manage conflict and promote interpersonal conflict resolution. This approach facilitates resolving conflict in a manner that addresses underlying issues and preserves relationships, even when faced with value conflict or other challenging scenarios.

Each conflict management style has its unique approach and applicability, depending on the nature of the dispute, the context in which it occurs, and the desired outcome. From assertively addressing the issue head-on to more cooperative, consensus-building strategies, the spectrum of conflict management is broad and varied.

Choosing the right style can mean the difference between prolonged strife and swiftly restored harmony. It involves considering not only one’s own concerns but also the other party‘s point of view and the dynamics of group identity. By effectively navigating these factors, individuals can address minor conflicts before they escalate and avoid prolonging conflict indefinitely.

This blog will explore the various types of conflict management, when and how each style should be applied, and provide practical examples to illustrate these concepts in action.

Whether you’re a team leader, a colleague, or someone looking to navigate everyday disagreements more effectively, this comprehensive guide will equip you with the knowledge and tools to manage conflicts constructively.

Understanding Conflict In Various Contexts for Conflict Resolution

“Peace is not absence of conflict, it is the ability to handle conflict by peaceful means.” — Ronald Reagan.

This insightful observation highlights the inevitability of conflict in all areas of life and underscores the importance of effective conflict management. Conflict is a process that begins when one party perceives that another has negatively affected, or is about to negatively affect, something that the first party cares about.

Understanding this dynamic is essential for employing appropriate conflict resolution tactics to effectively resolve conflict and achieve a beneficial outcome. By addressing minor conflicts promptly and considering the other person’s point of view in a conflict situation, individuals can work to reduce conflict and foster positive relationships.

This broad definition encompasses various scenarios, from workplace conflicts in the organisations to interpersonal conflicts in personal relationships.

Understanding Conflict In Various Contexts

Common Sources Of Conflict

Conflict occurs from resource constraints where individuals or groups compete over limited resources, whether tangible (like office space or budget allocations for other departments) or intangible (such as recognition or authority).

Personality clashes are also frequent, occurring when individuals with differing personalities interact and experience misunderstandings due to varying communication styles or behavioral expectations. Additionally, goal misalignment in a workplace can cause conflicts when team members or departments have goals that conflict with each other or organizational objectives.

Understanding each other’s value system and being mindful of body language can help in avoiding conflict and finding a win-win solution. When faced with conflicts, considering conflict resolution tactics that emphasize collaboration and seeking a solution simply rather than imposing a different solution can lead to effective resolution, even in minor conflict scenarios.

Lastly, a common source of conflict is information deficiencies which lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of intentions or facts due to lack of information or miscommunication.

Impact Of Unresolved Conflicts

The repercussions of not effectively addressing these minor conflicts are significant and far-reaching. Unresolved conflicts can lead to reduced productivity, as parties involved spend time and energy on the conflict situations instead of focusing on their tasks, leading to delays, decreased efficiency, and wasted resources.

This ongoing strife can create a toxic atmosphere, lowering morale, increasing stress, and higher turnover rates. 

Impact Of Unresolved Conflicts

Moreover, when all other employees are stuck in conflicts, collaboration suffers along with the creative processes that drive innovation and improvement, thereby stifling innovation. Over time, if conflicts are not appropriately managed, personal and professional relationships can deteriorate, potentially leading to long-term animosity and breakdowns in communication.

Understanding these aspects of conflict provides a solid foundation for exploring the types of conflict management strategies that can be employed to address disputes effectively.

By recognizing the sources and impacts of conflicts, individuals and organisations can tailor their approaches to conflict management to suit specific situations and achieve more harmonious and productive outcomes.

The Five Major Types Of Conflict Management

In managing conflicts effectively, it’s crucial to understand the different styles of conflict management that can be employed depending on the situation and the desired outcomes.

Each style offers unique advantages and can be appropriate under other circumstances.

Here, we explore the five major styles that researchers Kenneth Thomas and Ralph Kilmann identified, providing insights into when and how each can be utilised effectively.

Five Major Types Of Conflict Management

1. Competing 

The competing style of conflict management is characterised by assertiveness and uncooperativeness, focusing primarily on one’s own needs often at the expense of others. This approach is inherently power-oriented, where the individuals involved act in their own interest without seeking to accommodate or adjust to other party’s concerns.

Competing is a style used when an individual takes a firm stand, and knows what they want. This style is generally used by people who hold more power, are confident, and feel their decision or direction is correct. It’s particularly prominent in high-stake business environments or situations requiring quick, decisive action.

When To Use The Competing Style

When To Use the Competing Style

  • Emergency Situations: When quick decision-making is critical and there is no time for an extended discussion, such as during a crisis or emergency.

  • Important Decisions: When the decision at hand will have significant impact and compromise might lead to a suboptimal outcome.

  • Protecting Vital Interests: When you need to stand firm because yielding could affect your or your organisation’s core interests or values.

Advantages of Competing

  • Efficiency: It can resolve conflicts quickly when time is of the essence.

  • Clarity: Provides clear, quick resolutions without ambiguity, which can be crucial in leadership and high-stakes decisions.

  • Protection of Essential Interests: Safeguards important values and vital organisational or personal interests.

Drawbacks Of Competing

  • Relationship strain: This can damage relationships if used excessively or inappropriately, as it may come across as aggressive or dismissive of others’ needs.

  • Risk of escalation: May escalate conflicts if the opposing party also responds competitively, leading to a potential deadlock of a lose-lose situation.

  • Overuse: If overused, it can lead to a lack of input or feedback from others, which might result in missed opportunities for innovative solutions or team engagement.

A notable example of the competing style is during the 1980 United States Olympic boycott. President Jimmy Carter, facing the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, decided to boycott the Moscow Olympics as a protest. Despite significant opposition from athletes, sporting federations, and international bodies who wanted to compete, Carter stood firm on the decision.

This act was based on the broader political interest of protesting Soviet military actions and pressuring them into withdrawal. Using the competing style, Carter made a clear and decisive stand, although it came at the cost of athletes’ opportunities and sparked considerable controversy and disappointment among the affected parties.

Effective Use Of Competing Style

  • Ensure justification: Always have a robust and rational justification for your stance which can be defended with facts and data.

  • Communicate clearly: Articulate your position clearly and confidently to prevent misunderstandings.

  • Assess the impact: Consider the potential impact on relationships and morale to mitigate negative effects.

2. Accommodating

The accommodating style of conflict management is characterised by emphasising cooperation at one’s own expense.

Individuals using this approach often set aside their concerns and desires to satisfy the concerns of others, making it a highly cooperative yet unassertive conflict management strategy. Accommodating is used when an individual prioritises the relationship over their personal goals.

This style is often employed when the issue at hand is more important to the other parties, or when it is critical to maintain harmony and avoid conflict. It is especially useful in maintaining peace or showing reasonableness in less significant matters.

When To Use The Accommodating Style

When to Use the Accommodating Style

  • To Preserve Relationships: When the relationship holds more value than the conflict itself, especially with clients or senior management.

  • When You’re Wrong: To concede when you find that your position is incorrect or less important, thus fostering respect and fairness in interactions.

  • To Build Credit: Employing accommodation can be strategic to build social capital, which can be useful in future conflicts or negotiations.

Advantages of Accommodating

  • Harmony and stability: Helps maintain peace and stability in working relationships, making it highly beneficial in sensitive or emotional contexts.

  • Flexibility demonstrated: Shows an understanding and adaptable nature, which can enhance one’s reputation as a team player.

  • Quick resolution: Often leads to faster resolutions, avoiding the potential escalation of conflict.

Drawbacks of Accommodating

  • Neglect of one’s own needs: Regular use can lead to neglect of one’s needs and interests, possibly leading to dissatisfaction or resentment.

  • Risk of being overlooked: Others may exploit one’s cooperativeness, potentially undermining one’s authority or position.

  • Undermines assertiveness: Can be perceived as a lack of backbone or assertiveness, impacting one’s influence in decision-making.

Nelson Mandela demonstrates a well-known instance of the accommodating style during his presidency in South Africa.

Mandela often adopted an accommodating approach towards the former apartheid leaders and other political opponents to foster national unity and healing. By prioritising the country’s peace over his personal or party interests, Mandela was able to facilitate a smoother transition from apartheid to a democratic society.

His accommodating style prevented potential conflicts and played a crucial role in maintaining stability during South Africa’s critical transformation period.

Effective Use of the Accommodating Style

  • Assess importance: Ensure that the issues where accommodating is used are less important to you than your counterpart.

  • Communicate willingly: Make it clear that your accommodation is a choice rather than a weakness, enhancing the gesture’s value.

  • Maintain balance: Use this style selectively to avoid patterns where your generosity or flexibility is taken for granted.

3. Avoiding 

The avoiding style of conflict management is characterised by withdrawal or sidestepping the issues.

This approach is unassertive and uncooperative, essentially not satisfying anyone’s concerns. Employed strategically, it can serve as a temporary respite or a permanent solution in cases where conflict resolution skills are deemed unnecessary or potentially harmful.

This section explores the use of the avoiding style, its appropriate contexts, advantages, drawbacks, and a corporate real-life example to underscore its application.

When To Use The Avoiding Style

When To Use The Avoiding Style

  • Trivial Matters: When the issue is trivial and does not impact larger goals or relationships.

  • Highly Charged Situations: To use the cool down period for heated emotions or when the timing is inappropriate for a productive discussion.

  • When More Information is Needed: Delaying decision-making until more facts are gathered or circumstances are more favourable.

  • When No Win is Possible: In situations where there is no possible positive outcome or where the potential damage from the confrontation exceeds the benefits of resolution.

Advantages Of Avoiding

  • Minimises damage: By not engaging in potentially destructive conflicts, it prevents situations from escalating.

  • Saves time and energy: Focuses resources on more important or solvable issues rather than on intractable conflicts.

  • Reduces stress: Provides a psychological reprieve by steering clear of stressful confrontations.

Drawbacks Of Avoiding

  • Unresolved issues: Problems may linger without resolution, potentially leading to bigger issues in the future.

  • Perception of apathy: Can be perceived as neglect or lack of courage to face difficult situations, affecting one’s credibility and leadership image.

  • Missed opportunities: Avoiding engagement can lead to missed opportunities to address underlying issues that could improve personal or organisational dynamics.

A pertinent example of the avoiding style is Apple Inc.’s strategic decision during the early 2000s to avoid the low-cost computer market.

Despite pressure and market trends favouring low-cost PCs, Apple chose to avoid this segment, focusing instead on innovating high-end, premium devices like the iMac and later the iPhone and iPad. This decision allowed Apple to preserve its brand image of quality and innovation, steering clear of the fierce competition and thin profit margins of the low-cost sector.

This strategic avoidance helped Apple avoid a conflict with its core brand values and market positioning, which paid off significantly as their product lines achieved massive success.

Effective Use Of The Avoiding Style

  • Clear assessment: Evaluate whether engagement or avoidance will yield the best outcome.

  • Communication: If avoidance is chosen, communicate your rationale where appropriate to mitigate any negative perceptions.

  • Regular review: Regularly reassess avoided conflicts to determine if conditions have changed that might make resolution possible or necessary.

4. Collaborating

The collaborating style of conflict management has moderate assertiveness and cooperation, striving to find a solution that fully satisfies all parties’ concerns.

It is considered one of the most constructive approaches to handling conflicts, emphasising problem-solving and partnership. This section delves into the situations where collaboration is most effective, its benefits, potential challenges, and a real-life example from the corporate world to illustrate its application.

Collaborating involves an open exchange of information, ideas, and resources to achieve win-win solutions where all parties feel they have gained something of value. This style is ideal when the relationships have a high level of importance and both parties’ outcomes are equally significant.

When To Use The Collaborating Style

When to use the collaborating style

  • Issues requiring mutual effort: Best suited for complex scenarios where different solutions are needed that satisfies all stakeholders.

  • Important relationships: Maintaining and strengthening the relationship is as important as resolving the conflict.

  • Long-term interactions: Particularly effective in organisations where parties must continue to work together cooperatively over time.

Advantages of collaborating

  • Innovative solutions: By integrating ideas from all parties, collaboration often leads to creative and sustainable solutions that would not have been discovered through competing or avoiding.

  • Builds trust: Enhances mutual respect and trust, demonstrating a commitment to meeting everyone’s needs.

  • Improves relationships: Often strengthens relationships by promoting honesty and respect throughout the conflict resolution styles.

Drawbacks of Collaborating

  • Time-Consuming: This style can be more effort and time-consuming than other methods due to the need for extensive discussion and negotiation.

  • Not Always Practical: May not be practical in all situations, especially where unpopular decision need to be made quickly or under resource constraints.

  • High Demand for EQ: Requires a high level of emotional intelligence and effective communication skills, which can be challenging to maintain consistently across all team members.

A classic example of successful collaboration is the partnership between Ford Motor Company and Toyota to create hybrid systems for light trucks and SUVs. Initiated in 2011, this collaboration allowed both automotive giants to pool their resources, knowledge, and technical expertise to develop a new generation of hybrid vehicles.

This partnership not only addressed the technical challenges but also satisfied both companies’ strategic interests: expanding Ford’s hybrid technology and reinforcing Toyota’s presence in the North American market.

The collaborative effort led to innovations beneficial to both parties and showcased a commitment to environmental sustainability.

Effective use of the collaborating style

  • Open communication: Foster an environment where open communication is encouraged and all parties can share their views without fear of judgement.

  • Active listening: Practise active listening to understand fully and appreciate the perspectives of all the people involved.

  • Focus on interests, not positions: Aim to uncover the underlying interests and needs rather than getting stuck on initial positions or demands.

  • Encourage equal participation: Ensure that all parties have equal opportunities to contribute to the discussion, which helps generate ownership and commitment to the outcomes.

5. Compromising

The compromising style of conflict management represents a middle ground between competing and accommodating, embodying moderate assertiveness and cooperativeness. This approach seeks to find a solution that satisfies both parties, making it ideal when necessary for a quick, mutually agreeable solution.

Compromising is used when both parties are willing to give up something to reach an agreement. It is particularly useful when the conflict needs to be resolved within a limited time frame or when other, more powerful conflict resolution tactics have failed.

When To Use The Compromising Style

When to use the compromising style

  • Strong commitment: When parties have equal power, are committed to the relationship, but have conflicting goals that are not deeply entrenched.

  • Temporary solutions: Useful for interim solutions while waiting for a more suitable time to address the issue deeply.

  • Complex Issues: When the issue is too complex to resolve in one go, compromising can provide a temporary fix that satisfies both parties partially.

Advantages of compromising

  • Faster Resolution: Tends to resolve conflicts faster than collaborating, as it does not require finding a perfect solution that fully meets everyone’s needs.

  • Reduces Tension: By ensuring neither party gets everything they want, but both receive something, tension and hostility can be reduced.

  • Maintains Relationships: Helps to maintain relationships by balancing assertiveness with cooperativeness, showing flexibility without appearing weak.

Drawbacks of Compromising

  • No perfect solutions: Rarely resolves problems entirely to everyone’s satisfaction, which could lead to future conflicts over the same issue.

  • Potential for resentment: If one party feels they have compromised more than the other, it can lead to feelings of resentment.

  • Overuse diminishes innovation: Regular reliance on compromise might discourage more creative or enduring solutions that could arise from more assertive approaches.

A notable instance of the compromising style in action is seen in the negotiations between Apple and Samsung over patent infringements.

After years of litigation spanned across multiple countries, both technology giants agreed to settle their lawsuits outside court in 2018. The compromise involved withdrawing all litigation outside of the United States, significantly reducing legal expenses and refocusing both companies on innovation rather than prolonged legal battles.

This agreement did not resolve all issues, as each company had to concede some points, but it allowed both to move forward without further escalating the conflict.

Effective use of the compromising style

  • Assertiveness with flexibility: Aim for equitable concessions from all parties to maintain fairness and commitment.

  • Set clear boundaries: Understand and communicate the limits of your willingness to compromise.

  • Emphasise common goals: Highlight shared objectives to keep negotiations positive and focused.

  • Monitor long-term effects: Monitor the outcomes of compromises to ensure they don’t sow seeds for future conflicts.

Conclusion

Understanding the various types of conflict management is crucial for effectively navigating the complexities of interpersonal and organisational dynamics. Each style—competing, accommodating, avoiding, collaborating, and compromising—serves a unique purpose and is suited to different situations. By mastering when and how to apply these styles, individuals can enhance their ability to manage conflicts with finesse, leading to improved relationships and more beneficial outcomes. 

Recognizing the right approach based on the specific course of action can transform potential challenges into opportunities for growth and development.

Accommodating conflict management styles ensures you are equipped to handle disputes constructively, fostering an environment of cooperation and mutual respect. Whether in personal interactions or in the workplace, these conflict resolution strategies are indispensable for achieving harmonious and effective collaborations.

Rishabh Bhandari

Rishabh Bhandari is the Content Strategist at Kapable. Rishabh likes to transform complex ideas into captivating narratives relatable to the target audience. He loves telling stories through his content. He believes that stories have the power to shift mindsets and move mountains. He has 3 years of experience in educational blog writing and copywriting.

Book Your First Session (28 June)