Conflict Management Strategies: 5 Ways to Manage Conflict, Effective Solutions, and Conflict Resolution Management

Conflicts are an inevitable part of life and conflict management is an essential skill, vital not only in the workplace but in everyday interactions. At its core, conflict management is the process by which disputes are resolved where negative results are minimised and positive outcome is prioritised. Personal or professional conflicts can be stressful, but effectively managing conflict can lead to growth and innovation. It also plays a crucial role in handling workplace conflicts and fostering better human relations, encouraging employees to resolve conflict constructively.

Understanding what sparks conflicts can significantly help in devising strategies for dealing with them constructively. In professional settings, conflict management is crucial for maintaining workplace harmony and fostering an environment where creative solutions and teamwork can flourish. It’s about finding common ground and resolving conflict in challenging situations, thereby avoiding the need for legal action. Effective conflict management also encourages employees to engage positively and collaboratively when conflicts arise.

This blog discusses the nature of conflict, the strategies to effectively manage it, and the benefits of effective conflict resolution. By the end of this exploration, you’ll have a clearer understanding of how skilled conflict management can transform potential workplace disruptions into opportunities for improvement and strengthened relationships.

Read on to discover the key strategies that can help anyone navigate conflicts with confidence and tact, whether at home, among friends, or within the vast dynamics of one’s professional life.

What Are The Common Causes of Conflicts?

Conflict in the workplace or in personal relationships often stems from several common sources. Understanding these can help identify and resolve conflicts before they escalate. Here are some of the predominant causes of conflicts, along with examples to illustrate how they manifest in real-world scenarios:

Common Causes Of Conflict

1. Communication Barriers

Poor or insufficient communication is perhaps the most frequent catalyst for conflict. Misunderstandings occur when messages are not clearly articulated or properly received. This can be due to language barriers, inadequate information, or misinterpreted nonverbal communication cues.

In a remote work setting, an email sent by a manager outlining task responsibilities is vague. This leads to confusion among team members about who is responsible for certain aspects of a project, causing friction and delays in delivery.

2. Resource Constraints

Limited resources can lead to significant conflict, particularly when teams or individuals rely on shared resources to achieve their goals. Scarcity can amplify competition and create disputes over prioritisation and allocation.

Two departments in a hospital—emergency and surgery—compete for the use of the same operating room, leading to conflicts over which department’s needs should take precedence.

3. Personality Clashes

When individuals with differing personalities interact, it can often lead to interpersonal conflict. This is particularly true in high-stress environments where personal coping styles and behaviours can dramatically differ.

A highly organised and detail-oriented project manager frequently clashes with a creative team member who prefers a more spontaneous and flexible approach to work.

4. Value Differences

Conflicts often arise when individuals or groups hold differing beliefs about what is important. These differences can be cultural, ethical, or personal. Such conflicts can have a deep root cause and can be emotionally charged.

In a multinational company, team members from different cultural backgrounds have conflicting views on work-life balance. Some prioritise long hours and dedication to the job, while others emphasise the importance of family time and personal well-being. The senior leaders need to understand and deal with such issues.  

5. Organisational Structure Issues

Conflicts can also stem from organisational issues, such as unclear hierarchy, lack of clear roles, or conflicting job duties, when people tend to have challenges understanding shared interests. Such structural problems can cause confusion and conflicts among employees over authority and responsibilities.

In a company, the overlap between the roles of two middle managers leads to conflict. Each manager believes they have the final say on certain decisions, which leads to power struggles and confusion among team members.

6. Unmet Expectations

When expectations are unclear, or a party does not communicate, it can lead to frustration and conflict. This is often seen in relationships where one party’s expectations are not aligned with the reality of the situation.

An employee expects regular feedback and career development opportunities, which were implied during the hiring process. When these expectations are met, it leads to satisfaction and disputes with management.

What Are The Different Conflict Management Strategies?

In conflict management, understanding different styles is crucial for higher leadership as it provides insights into how individuals approach and handle conflicts. Each style has its unique attributes and is appropriate in different contexts. Here’s a more comprehensive exploration of each of the five strategies:

Conflict Management Strategies

1. Competing

This style is highly assertive and minimally cooperative, often viewed as aggressive and unyielding. It involves standing up for one’s own rights and defending a position that one believes is correct or simply trying to win with the least use of negotiation. Competing is particularly useful in situations where quick, decisive action is needed—such as during emergencies—or where unpopular but necessary decisions need to be enforced. It’s also effective when the other party takes advantage of non-competitive behaviour. A manager might need to enforce a new, non-negotiable safety policy in the workplace. Despite resistance, the manager pushes the policy forward to meet safety standards and regulations. Overuse of this style can lead to reduced collaboration and can harm relationships, creating a hostile environment.

2. Collaborating

This style is both highly assertive and highly cooperative. It is the approach of working together to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of all parties. It involves digging into an issue to identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and finding an alternative that meets both sets of concerns. Best used in complex situations where the stakes and the value of maintaining relationships are high. This style is ideal when merging insights from individuals with different perspectives or finding innovative solutions to problems. During regular team meetings for product development, team members from engineering, marketing, and sales collaborate to create a product design that balances user needs, marketability, and manufacturability. This approach can be time-consuming and may require a high degree of trust and communication, which might not always be feasible.

3. Compromising

This middle-ground style is moderately assertive and cooperative. It is essentially a give-and-take approach where both parties give up something to make a mutually beneficial solution. Compromising is useful when the cost of conflict is higher than the cost of losing ground, when equal strength opponents are at a standstill, or when there is a deadline looming. Two project leaders agree to share limited resources by compromising on their team’s working hours to ensure both projects advance. This may result in a solution where neither party is fully satisfied, and important values or long-term objectives might be sacrificed for short-term peace.

4. Avoiding

This unassertive and uncooperative style involves sidestepping the conflict, withdrawing from it, or postponing it. Avoiding can be seen as diplomatically sidestepping an issue or simply staying away from a threatening situation. Effective when the issue is trivial or when more important issues are pressing. It’s also strategic when the potential damage of confronting a conflict outweighs the benefits of its resolution. An employee chooses not to engage in a heated debate over a non-critical issue, deciding instead to focus on more urgent tasks. Overusing avoidance can lead to unresolved issues festering and escalating into bigger problems.

5. Accommodating

This style is unassertive and cooperative—the mirror opposite of competing. Accommodating involves self-sacrifice, offering to help with little or no attention to one’s own interests. Useful when you find you are wrong—to allow a better position to be heard, to learn, and to show that you are reasonable. It’s also effective when issues are more important to the other party. A team leader allows a team member to lead a project they feel passionate about, even though the leader might have more experience. If overused, others may take advantage, and one’s ideas and concerns may not get the attention they deserve.

How To Use Conflict Resolution In The Workplace?

Workplace conflict, if not managed properly, can lead to decreased productivity, lowered morale, and a toxic work environment. However, with effective conflict resolution strategies, you can turn conflicts into opportunities for team building and improvement. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to use conflict resolution effectively in the workplace:

How To Use Conflict Resolution In The Workplace

Acknowledge The Conflict

The first step in resolving any conflict is acknowledging that it exists. Ignoring the issue can lead to resentment and a deeper entrenchment of positions. A manager notices tension between two team members and decides to address it directly by acknowledging it in a meeting and expressing the intention to resolve the conflict constructively.

Define The Problem

Once the conflict is acknowledged, it’s crucial to define the problem clearly and understand the underlying issues. This involves discussing the perspectives of all parties involved and pinpointing the exact nature of the disagreement. The manager holds individual meetings with the involved parties to gather each person’s viewpoint and summarise the core issue, such as a miscommunication over job roles or a clash of working styles.

Meet On Neutral Ground

Meeting in a neutral, private space can help diffuse tensions. This setting removes the power dynamics that might be present in a personal office or workspace.

Example: The manager arranges a mediation session in a neutral conference room where both parties can feel comfortable and equal, free from interruptions and external pressures.

Let Everyone Have a Say

Each party should provide opportunities to express their thoughts and feelings without interruption. Encourage open communication between all the parties. This step is crucial for making each feel heard and valued, which can facilitate a more cooperative atmosphere. During the mediation session, each team member is given time to explain their side of the story and express their concerns and feelings regarding the conflict, while others do active listening.

Agree On A Solution

After everyone has had the chance to speak, the next step is to find a middle ground to get a win-win solution that all parties can agree on. This may involve compromise or finding a new approach that satisfies everyone’s needs.

The manager helps the team members understand each other’s needs and guides them to a compromise where responsibilities are divided. Expectations are set, ensuring no overlap in job roles.

Determine Each Side’s Role In The Solution

It’s important that each party knows their specific role in resolving the conflict and ensuring it does not reoccur. This clarity can prevent future misunderstandings. Each team member agrees to specific tasks and communication strategies, such as weekly check-ins and clear documentation of work progress, to maintain transparency and prevent future conflicts.

Follow-up

Following up after the resolution is essential to ensure that the agreed-upon solutions are implemented and the conflict has not resurfaced. This follow-up also shows an ongoing commitment to a harmonious work environment. The manager schedules follow-up meetings a month after the resolution to review the progress and make adjustments if necessary.

Conclusion

It’s important to remember that conflict resolution skills are not just about resolving a disagreement but about fostering an environment where all team members feel heard, respected, and valued. This approach not only resolves the immediate issues but also strengthens the team’s ability to work together effectively in the future. Moreover, regular training and reinforcement of these conflict management strategies can help embed them into the organisational culture, ensuring that conflicts are managed efficiently as they arise.

By embracing these strategies, leaders and employees can build a more cohesive and supportive workplace atmosphere, leading to better communication, enhanced cooperation, and increased productivity. Remember, the goal of conflict resolution is not just to ‘win’ or to avoid conflict at all costs but to find a solution that benefits everyone involved and contributes to the long-term success of the organisation.

Rishabh Bhandari

Rishabh Bhandari is the Content Strategist at Kapable. Rishabh likes to transform complex ideas into captivating narratives relatable to the target audience. He loves telling stories through his content. He believes that stories have the power to shift mindsets and move mountains. He has 3 years of experience in educational blog writing and copywriting.

Book Your First Session (28 June)